G'day,
Upwash and downwash effects on the relative airflow are reduced in ground effect, because (to put it simply) the ground simply gets in the way and physically prevents the formation of strong vortices. This reduction in up- and downwash means the relative airflow (RAF) is not deflected downwards so dramatically as the wing moves through it. Since lift acts perpendicular to the relative airflow, as the direction of the RAF changes, so too does the direction of the lift vector.
Downwash means the lift vector is oriented more towards the rear, resulting in a component of the lift actually acting opposite to the direction of motion. This is induced drag.
More downwash means a more rearward orientation of the lift vector and more induced drag.
Less downwash means less rearward orientation of the lift vector and less induced drag.
Therefore, since ground effect reduces downwash, it also reduces induced drag.
The result of this change on the aircraft's handling can be summarised as follows:
Leaving ground effect causes a reduction in longitudinal stability and a nose up pitching moment
Entering ground effect causes an increase in longitudinal stability and a nose down pitching moment.
These are the worst combinations of effects on the aircraft as you transit in and out of ground effect. In fact that's an easy way to help you remember which is which.
I don't know if you have already seen this topic, but there are some good answers in here too :
www.bobtait.com.au/forum/aerodynamics/4959-ground-effect#7734
Or a nice plain language article here as well:
code7700.com/ground_effect.html
Cheers,
Rich